links in the news
Published on February 28, 2004 By EMacy In Blogging
In the news:
Condi refuses to testify publically about 9/11. That's a shame because she knows what went down on September 11, 2001. Why doesn 't this surprise me?

" I can't understand why these elected officials, particularly the president and vice president, aren't willing to come before the American public and testify," said Kristen Breitweiser of New Jersey, whose husband, Ronald, died in the World Trade Center. "That raises a concern they're hiding something."
You could say that...only louder: "They're hiding something!!!"
"President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney have placed strict limits on the private interviews they will grant to the federal commission investigating the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, saying they will meet only with the panel's top two officials and that Bush will submit to only a single hour of questioning, panel members said Wednesday.

A single hour??? That's all their hollow-brains could tolerate? All those boring, difficult questions before a bipartisan commitee about what happened on 9/11. A whole hour. If I were a relative of one of the casualties of 9/11_ I'd be beyond livid with this administrations distant-approach to their tragic losses.
This terrible human tragedy, the loss of 3000+ lives in NYC, PA and Washingtone DC is looking more and more like a pretext for removing American citizens rights and fighting pre emptive war in Iraq/ Afgahanastan. I believe the government had more to do with this than their cohorts, Bin Laden or al-quada_they were allies.
How would America react if the average Joe knew their " trusted" leaders and The CIA had conspired to allow the bombing of several buildings. There are just too many unanswered questions and too much secrecy. Like why did they decide to " pull" WTC7 on that afternoon? I think they " pulled" all 3 buildings, the way they fell was just too perfect_too planned.
It's like Henry Kissinger slipped up and ( actually) said once while the tape recorder was running at a Bilderburg Pow-Wow in 1973_something like:
If UN troops arrived in Los Angeles today_the people would rebel and become angry, if we told them they are under attack, real or perceived_they would thank UN troops for arriving.
You been scammed Uncle Sam. See it for what it is: a neo-con to strip citizens of any and all civil rights. Show the world how great you are and overthrow your government ( or atleast E-lect...not S-elect...someone else)
The CIA ran this covert operation_9/11. It's a huge scandal_but the sheep are afraid ( now) and (think) they need protection so they Welcome the loss of civil rights, like Kissinger predicted: give them something to fear and they will appreciate losing all of their " freedoms" because they are " safe". What a trade-off.
Sounds like a con to me...and Bush is a shitty liar_he really can't do it. It's like watching your child lie_you just know they are lying beacuse their emotions are so transparent, their ears turn red, eye-contact is difficult etc._they can't lie about how they feel, it doesn't work, their bodies give them away_kinda like the Chimp there in the Big Ovary Office, he can not tell a lie.
Is John Q. Public expected just to take all of these questions surrounding intelligence on pure,unadulterated faith? Like The Holy Rollers?_just accept that Christ died for all my evil sins and returned from heaven...FOR ME and my multitude of sins? Accept what the government is telling me, have faith. Faith, gotta have faith.
( Bullocks!)
RIGHT...
The entire government should be sacked for conspiracy.
Does justice prevail when the CIA get's involved in covert operations against IT"S OWN PEOPLE? Who's checking and balancing them? Oh yeah, The Prez...who's checking and balancing them? Oh, right the Republicans running the entire show, keep checks and balances on THEMSELVES? Nahhhhhh, don't think this has been checked or balanced...that's just funny, they get away with it!




Comments
on Feb 28, 2004
So where is your evidence. They may be hiding something but what are they hiding?